Imagine a car as a metaphor for a congregation. Place Vision, Relationships, Programs, and Management in this vehicle in the seat best suited for each to symbolize a faithful, effective, and innovative journey for a congregation.
Who would drive?
Who would navigate?
Where would Programs sit? Why?
Where would Management sit? Why?
What happens when Vision gets tired and needs to take a nap in the back seat? Who drives, then? What does Proverbs 29:18 say about this?
Where there is no vision, guess who drives? What happens then?
Each organizing principle must play out its appropriate role in its best seat in the vehicle for the journey to be excellent and transformational.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Organizing Principles
Here's part 2 of the class I'm teaching, Leading Change in the Congregation.
Because the environment in which we do ministry is both complex and constantly changing, there is not a simple and straightforward movement toward goals.
What we often need from God, and what our congregations often need from their leaders, is not a quick map to the final destination, but bread for the wilderness – sustenance and strategies to help us find our ways.
Before we begin to look at the stages of development, it will be helpful for us to look at 4 Organizing Principles that form the DNA of the Life Cycle. A major element in understanding the life cycle of a congregation is to understand the pattern of the organizing principles that form the DNA and make up the various stages of the congregational life. This life cycle is principle driven.
Vision: The current understanding of God’s spiritual strategic direction for a local congregation that is cast by the leadership and owned by the membership.
Relationships: The relational processes by which persons are brought to faith in God and through Jesus Christ; become connected to a local New Testament church; are assimilated into the fellowship, life, and care ministry of the church; have opportunities for spiritual growth and leadership development; and utilize their gifts and skills through Kingdom involvement.
Programs: The functional attempts to provide services, activities, and training for people connected to the congregation by membership, attendance, fellowship or through relationship processes (These are the things we do for us. Sunday School is an example of a program.)
Management: The administration of the resources of the congregation, the decision-making structure of the congregation, the formal and informal culture of the congregation, and the openness of the congregation to change and grow.
Look at these 4 organizing principles as one approach to the assessment of a congregation. To empower our observation, reference 2 Corinthians 5:7, which admonishes us to “walk by faith rather than by sight.”
Congregations that focus more passion on Vision and Relationships are growing younger and more proactive every day. Younger does not necessarily mean the age demographics of the congregation are growing younger, but that may be a by-product. It means that, as a representation of the body of Christ, they appear younger or more vital. They are proactive in their actions and regularly seize the opportunities God is placing before them.
Congregations that focus more passion on Programs and Management are growing older and more passive every day. As a representation of the body of Christ they daily appear older and less vital. They are passive in their actions, and regularly seek to maintain past gains, an effort that leads to less satisfying results.
What percentage of Protestant churches do you think place more emphasis on Programs and Management than they do on Vision and Relationships? What percentage do you think place more emphasis on Vision and Relationships? What do you think is the result on placing more emphasis on Vision and Relationships?
Because the environment in which we do ministry is both complex and constantly changing, there is not a simple and straightforward movement toward goals.
What we often need from God, and what our congregations often need from their leaders, is not a quick map to the final destination, but bread for the wilderness – sustenance and strategies to help us find our ways.
Before we begin to look at the stages of development, it will be helpful for us to look at 4 Organizing Principles that form the DNA of the Life Cycle. A major element in understanding the life cycle of a congregation is to understand the pattern of the organizing principles that form the DNA and make up the various stages of the congregational life. This life cycle is principle driven.
Vision: The current understanding of God’s spiritual strategic direction for a local congregation that is cast by the leadership and owned by the membership.
Relationships: The relational processes by which persons are brought to faith in God and through Jesus Christ; become connected to a local New Testament church; are assimilated into the fellowship, life, and care ministry of the church; have opportunities for spiritual growth and leadership development; and utilize their gifts and skills through Kingdom involvement.
Programs: The functional attempts to provide services, activities, and training for people connected to the congregation by membership, attendance, fellowship or through relationship processes (These are the things we do for us. Sunday School is an example of a program.)
Management: The administration of the resources of the congregation, the decision-making structure of the congregation, the formal and informal culture of the congregation, and the openness of the congregation to change and grow.
Look at these 4 organizing principles as one approach to the assessment of a congregation. To empower our observation, reference 2 Corinthians 5:7, which admonishes us to “walk by faith rather than by sight.”
Congregations that focus more passion on Vision and Relationships are growing younger and more proactive every day. Younger does not necessarily mean the age demographics of the congregation are growing younger, but that may be a by-product. It means that, as a representation of the body of Christ, they appear younger or more vital. They are proactive in their actions and regularly seize the opportunities God is placing before them.
Congregations that focus more passion on Programs and Management are growing older and more passive every day. As a representation of the body of Christ they daily appear older and less vital. They are passive in their actions, and regularly seek to maintain past gains, an effort that leads to less satisfying results.
What percentage of Protestant churches do you think place more emphasis on Programs and Management than they do on Vision and Relationships? What percentage do you think place more emphasis on Vision and Relationships? What do you think is the result on placing more emphasis on Vision and Relationships?
Sunday, June 7, 2009
Take a Look at Differences in the Way Leaders View People
John Maxwell shares these views with us in his book, "Developing The Leaders Around You." (This comes from the 1st class that I'm currently teaching, Leading Change in the Church.") "Often, leaders wrongly believe that they must compete with the people close to them instead off working with them . . . This kind of interaction can happen only if the leader has an attitude of interdependency with others and is committed to win-win relationships."
Winning by Competitiveness
Look at others as enemies.
Concentrate on yourself.
Become suspicious of others.
Win only if you are good.
Winning determined by your skills.
Small victory
Some joy
There are winners and losers.
OR
Winning by Cooperation
Look at others as friends.
Concentrate on others.
Become supportive of others.
Win if you or others are good.
Winning determined by the skills of many.
Large Victory
Much Joy
There are only winners.
Where have you seen these views come into play?
I once had a person tell me, "Well I guess I lost that battle." How did that person view me . . . as a friend or an enemy? Where was that person concentrating . . . on themselves or on others. Where they creating only winners or winners and losers?
Winning by Competitiveness
Look at others as enemies.
Concentrate on yourself.
Become suspicious of others.
Win only if you are good.
Winning determined by your skills.
Small victory
Some joy
There are winners and losers.
OR
Winning by Cooperation
Look at others as friends.
Concentrate on others.
Become supportive of others.
Win if you or others are good.
Winning determined by the skills of many.
Large Victory
Much Joy
There are only winners.
Where have you seen these views come into play?
I once had a person tell me, "Well I guess I lost that battle." How did that person view me . . . as a friend or an enemy? Where was that person concentrating . . . on themselves or on others. Where they creating only winners or winners and losers?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)